Lesia Huretska, head of the information policy department at the Ternopil Regional Prosecutor’s Office, told an Ukrinform correspondent. “The defendant in the case is the religious organization of the Pochaiv Holy Dormition Lavra, while the Kremenets-Pochaiv State Historical and Architectural Reserve, which manages the state property, is a third party supporting the plaintiff. The grounds for early termination of the 50-year agreement are gross violations by the religious organization of the terms of use and heritage protection legislation,” Huretska said.
We show the main point publicly. Create a free account to continue reading the full article, save it, discuss it, and connect it with market and OSINT context.