Переклад ще не готовий. Показано оригінал статті.
Lesia Huretska, head of the information policy department at the Ternopil Regional Prosecutor’s Office, told an Ukrinform correspondent. “The defendant in the case is the religious organization of the Pochaiv Holy Dormition Lavra, while the Kremenets-Pochaiv State Historical and Architectural Reserve, which manages the state property, is a third party supporting the plaintiff. The grounds for early termination of the 50-year agreement are gross violations by the religious organization of the terms of use and heritage protection legislation,” Huretska said.
Головну думку ми показуємо публічно. Створіть безкоштовний акаунт, щоб читати повну статтю, зберігати її, обговорювати та поєднувати з ринковим і OSINT-контекстом.
